The Holographic Universe Explained

Commentaires

  1. Eric M.

    Eric M.Il y a 20 minutes

    It seems that the holographic principle has the potential to be a theory of everything but its still a work in progress. That two of the hints came from black holes (Hawking radiation and bh entropy) leaves me to wonder where the next clues might appear. And yeah there is a lot in this video but my neurons are getting mad swole from the workout.

  2. Andrew James

    Andrew JamesIl y a heure

    I'm not trusting the words from Penis Broadcast Semen.

  3. ZFlyingVLover

    ZFlyingVLoverIl y a heure

    Sounds like alot of mumbo jumbo similar to new math. Does this stuff add up? Yes or No? If no then useless like new math and common core.

  4. Pedro Victor

    Pedro VictorIl y a 2 heures

    Let me think A 2D Quantum Field in a 4D Minkowsky Space generates a 3D Universe

  5. kalez238

    kalez238Il y a 5 heures

    Sorry, what? I was distracted by the bananas.

  6. Ray Brandt

    Ray BrandtIl y a 7 heures

    Aaaaaah, so you mean... that... wait, no, I didn't get it.

  7. Daan Scatozza

    Daan ScatozzaIl y a 7 heures

    life is a puzzle

  8. Jyrki Holopainen

    Jyrki HolopainenIl y a 9 heures

    The music is very distracting. The content is already hard enough without it.

  9. Rafael Ramirez

    Rafael RamirezIl y a 10 heures

    Nothing but theory...blah!

  10. MrPxKx

    MrPxKxIl y a 11 heures

    I feel dizzy...

  11. Ryan Dawson

    Ryan DawsonIl y a 18 heures

    Marvel movies are great. Up until Brie Larson.

  12. Ray Brandt

    Ray BrandtIl y a 7 heures

    Loving Brie Larson here, especially the scenes with Nick Fury, good stuff. Definitely better than anything in the Dark World, an easy example.

  13. Bobby Boomer

    Bobby BoomerIl y a jour

    Uh.....huh?

  14. Afterlifesinner

    AfterlifesinnerIl y a jour

    I can't help but feel distracted by the background music. I remember spacetime always tending towards more subtle soundtracks. is it just me.

  15. Brandon Feltman

    Brandon FeltmanIl y a jour

    so i had an idea, but i wouldnt know who to ask or where to ask. but here it is: what if dark matter is actually the area within space-time where actual matter will exist or has existed throughout the entirety of all space-time? it would somewhat explain why dark matter seems to have gravitational effects on current matter. its not a separate matter acting on "current" matter..its just matter that will be there, or has been there at some point. made sense to me, but i dont really have physicists around to tell me im wrong :)

  16. Rain Ghost

    Rain GhostIl y a jour

    Im edgy and original, i understood everything, glad my buddies fractals are shown some love finally.

  17. IdoN0TneedTherapy

    IdoN0TneedTherapyIl y a jour

    Interesting video plagued by awful and too loud ambience. Please reduce the ambience volume on future videos. Preferably to zero.

  18. Some Fella

    Some FellaIl y a jour

    Another dumb ass nonsense vid! Zzzz ffs get a grip on REALITY!

  19. Ladnavar

    LadnavarIl y a jour

    science is weird.. I'm not complaining caz I didnt understand half of this, but the examples and theoretical mambjamb in this video became so extreme I thought that it didnt matter anymore. at such large scales even if the universe fits the definition of a simulation it has nothing to do with us. in the same way that no one reading this comment will ever experience falling into a black hole.. unless practical implications/applications become apparent soon, this is just intellect masturbation Xp

  20. srinitaaigaura

    srinitaaigauraIl y a jour

    I demand a video with a detailed explanation for that black hole photograph - how, who, what, when and what challenges they faced.

  21. MrPxKx

    MrPxKxIl y a 11 heures

    Shitloads of them already on youtube.

  22. Filming life to Remember it.

    Filming life to Remember it.Il y a jour

    Here's something Matt O' Dowd, can ponder when he has a coffee chat with fellow astronomers. Tuesday morning, April 23. Fourteen minutes after sunrise, looking-down at the Barge Canal, in New York, from a bridge, A mirror reflection of the sky. A patch of sky became brilliant blue. Hazy white surrounding it. Then. In a heartbeat, it closed-up. From the inside-out. Like getting suck-in by a vacuum. No. Not my imagination, as others saw the same. Straight-up. An arms length from the Sun's position. A cosmic phenomena? Weather related? A worm hole? Just when science claims to have the answer, the Universe changes the question. The Universe must be Liberal.

  23. Radu Morosanu

    Radu MorosanuIl y a jour

    where did you got that shirt?

  24. DarkCanister

    DarkCanisterIl y a jour

    Did you have a new animator? The animation style for this episode looks different from the previous ones.

  25. Rami Sadiq

    Rami SadiqIl y a jour

    I challenge this guy to break this down in terms where everyone can understand.

  26. Archontasius

    ArchontasiusIl y a jour

    So we are flatlanders living in imaginary third dimension until e abbot imagine a flatland itself

  27. Tomas Molina

    Tomas MolinaIl y a jour

    "One Maldacena" HAHA xD

  28. Cameron Wheeless

    Cameron WheelessIl y a jour

    Speaking of Sir Roger Penrose dressed as Gandalf wielding a lightsaber... when is the Conformal Cyclic Cosmology theory episode coming out!?!?!

  29. Shirin Chatterjee

    Shirin ChatterjeeIl y a jour

    I miss you

  30. Thelittle200

    Thelittle200Il y a jour

    So the projector is the great attractor! Just kidding love the show 😁

  31. Karen Nagamoto

    Karen NagamotoIl y a 2 jours

    I know the animator has put in a lot of effort but it's way to much and distracting. Also the "background" music is so loud I have a hard time actually following the content.

  32. Lisa Hennessey

    Lisa HennesseyIl y a 2 jours

    It's amazing how one can understand English words yet not have a clue what was said the whole video!!

  33. zimek

    zimekIl y a 2 jours

    To authors: why don't you do a video on quantized inertia topic?

  34. Corey Scott

    Corey ScottIl y a 2 jours

    He has certainly not mastered the art of rendering anything comprehensible.

  35. Jasper Lawrence

    Jasper LawrenceIl y a 2 jours

    Matt something about black holes and the big bang bothers me. If the entire universe at the moment of the big bang was in a singularity, a black hole containing our entire universe, why and how would that explode with sufficient energy to destroy the singularity? has anyone calculated the energy required to blow up a black hole of a particular size in our universe?

  36. Subparanon

    SubparanonIl y a 2 jours

    Spacetime, I have a question about energy and entropy. We all know there is no perpetual motion, I mean if there were, the more it happened, the more it would tend to happen. It would mean a source of energy that would just keep growing and growing unchecked. But lets do a thought experiment a second. The amount of energy in a system doesn't necessarily correlate to how much potential energy there is, or how much work can be extracted from that energy. For instance an automobile engine wouldn't produce very much work if the temperature and density of the air outside the engine, was the same as the combusted gases inside of it. It's the difference in heat and pressure that makes the engine do work. So lets say there was perpetual motion, and it just kept pumping energy into a closed system; at a certain point, in spite of there being lots of energy, the density of it would start to become uniform, IE things get hot and expand, and so at a certain point, it wouldn't matter how energetic it was, if everything was energetic right? If the universe were having infinite amounts of energy pumped into it forever, would we even notice it? I mean from the perspective of doing more or less work. Things would get hot for awhile but it's a closed system, temperatures would equalize, and probably matter might get hotter and hotter, and molecules would be unstable, but would it produce any more usable work? I hope you understand what I'm asking because I find it hard to express it with words. I'm trying to say that I don't think perpetual energy in a closed system affects entropy in the long run unless you also have perpetual non-energy. The opposite of energy, sucking it back out unequal to what is going in.

  37. Azimech_ 77 Industries

    Azimech_ 77 IndustriesIl y a 2 jours

    You have a great voice, even for falling asleep. Unfortunately I am unable of comprehending even the rudimentary basics of quantum mechanics. I just hope to filter out a simple conclusion I can use.

  38. Alfonso J. Ramos

    Alfonso J. RamosIl y a 2 jours

    Could you make a video explaining this: phys.org/news/2019-04-wormholes.html

  39. Monkey Robots Inc.

    Monkey Robots Inc.Il y a 2 jours

    U guys aren't good at teaching stuff.

  40. Monkey Robots Inc.

    Monkey Robots Inc.Il y a 2 jours

    Wat

  41. Jakes comic review Superheros

    Jakes comic review SuperherosIl y a 2 jours

    The commentator is a flat earther

  42. R3ll1k73

    R3ll1k73Il y a 2 jours

    "Biological fact: It is well established that the brain uses more energy than any other human organ, accounting for >>>up to 20 percent

  43. Jared Coatney

    Jared CoatneyIl y a 2 jours

    Nice hidden swastikas in your graphics. I'm hoping it wasn't intentional. @10:35 Might wanna change your game of life representation.

  44. Kargadan

    KargadanIl y a 2 jours

    watch this video in a dark room at full screen... XD fun visualizations. Anyways I still don't fully comprehend how our universe is "projected", how is the projecting happening(through what means?)

  45. Rain Ghost

    Rain GhostIl y a jour

    Hint: professor Suskind lecture, find it easily on youtube

  46. babyplaze

    babyplazeIl y a 2 jours

    Is anyone else watching this at 4am thinking they've been transported to the year 3000 and we're supposed to understand everything in this video?

  47. Dan Sternof Beyer

    Dan Sternof BeyerIl y a 3 jours

    I watched this episode like Picard watches Geordi La Forge give a detailed explanation of how he’s going to solve something technical. I didn’t totally understand, but I knew the case was in good hands. At the end I pointed and said, “Make it so.”

  48. ZappBrannigan23

    ZappBrannigan23Il y a 3 jours

    Do this next! bigthink.com/surprising-science/matter-can-travel-to-the-future-thru-black-holes-predicts-new-theory?rebelltitem=4#rebelltitem4

  49. IntermediateJesus

    IntermediateJesusIl y a 3 jours

    This is like my favourite theory of physics ever.

  50. Dajuan A.P.

    Dajuan A.P.Il y a 3 jours

    Alex Jones was talking about this a few months ago

  51. Ryan Nickens

    Ryan NickensIl y a 3 jours

    The music is not necessary, and actually quite disruptive. I can appreciate you guys trying new things, but the music is just not a good fit for this channel. Just my two cents

  52. Oliver Curwen

    Oliver CurwenIl y a heure

    It makes cents to me!

  53. Abouelazz Ali

    Abouelazz AliIl y a 3 jours

    If a ring form spacecraft rotates around an axel in in order to create fake gravity from the centrifugal force it s is still conciderd an acceleration right? If it is will it dilate space time? Pls if someone knows the answer help 😊😊

  54. Craig Craigson

    Craig CraigsonIl y a 3 jours

    Question: I was thinking about determinism. If you hypothetically could go back to the beginning of the universe and measure the mass, velocity and every single property of every single particle and all things that existed in that tiny space, you could then predict every single thing that was ever going to happen afterwards, right? I see no flaw, except, I do not know to which degree the quantum world is immeasurable. Of course not with our technology, but to prove determinism, we only hypothetically have to be able to measure it. Do we simply not know, or is it measurable? Thanks in advance, Any input greatly appreciated.

  55. Steve Nesbit

    Steve NesbitIl y a 3 jours

    So does a holographic universe explain quantum entanglement in that while we see things as entangled (but not connected in a known way) in our "reality" created from the holographic surface, but on the holographic surface itself the entangled particles are connected in some way?

  56. Avi Aero

    Avi AeroIl y a 3 jours

    Would you agree the current 3+1 space time holographic universe to be essentially a remnant of a higher dimensional universe ejected via a white hole during Big Bang? 🤔🤔🤔

  57. Nafrost

    NafrostIl y a 3 jours

    It’s amazing what we can do with the same brains we used to throw stones at each other.

  58. Robert Mihai

    Robert MihaiIl y a 2 jours

    No man! Those brains are long dead

  59. Nafrost

    NafrostIl y a 3 jours

    Man this video built heavily on previous one, good thing I have been watching Space Time from about when the first episode of string theory came out.

  60. Abhi

    AbhiIl y a 3 jours

    Yo

  61. Michael Parrott-MacLeod

    Michael Parrott-MacLeodIl y a 3 jours

    A perfect holographic projection in a universe that is imperfect? This is a construct not viable totally based on a quantum event at a black hole never seen or may never be seen since it’s beyond our perception.

  62. Likas Pokas

    Likas PokasIl y a 3 jours

    When you do local transformations : scale (Weyl symmetry ) , local rotation (gauge transformation of dirac field).. etc Sometimes you visualize those transformations as active transformations (changing the function itself) and sometimes as passive transformations (rotation of the coordinates without touching the function) .. Are both types of transformation correct and equivalent?

  63. grawss

    grawssIl y a 3 jours

    JFC, this is craziness. Basically every bit of terminology you used is based on science unproven in any laboratory experiment, built off other terminology unproven in laboratory experiment. Stop just adding new unproven terms to fill in the gaps of bad science; it's high time science figures out how the basics work before building all sorts of new forces and particles to substitute for our ignorance. "The weird thing is that when you write the quantum wave equation for the gluon strand with length as a separate dimension, you get the wave equation of a graviton, the quantum particle of gravity, which is ridiculous given the puny energy of a meson!" Wtf is this nonsense. Have we suddenly figured out all this "quantum" stuff? Are we Facebook messaging different dimensions now? You're just looking at results, making calculations for those results, and then when the calculations fail in any case, creating new terminology to explain away the failures. 'Oh, it must be an entirely new force we can't test in the lab and have no evidence of; it cannot possibly be that we're wrong!'

  64. 50PullUps

    50PullUpsIl y a 3 jours

    I don't understand. And I never will. Either that, or I will only believe that I understand.

  65. Chris-stuff-ER

    Chris-stuff-ERIl y a 3 jours

    He looks like Peter dinkleage

  66. elfootman

    elfootmanIl y a 3 jours

    Where can I get the soundtrack used? It's amazing!

  67. TheTails63

    TheTails63Il y a 3 jours

    We might be a microscopic part of a bigger organism

  68. Krish Dhameliya

    Krish DhameliyaIl y a 3 jours

    I have a question by no mean I am an expert in black holes but as I understand it when something is thrown inside a black hole it says on the event horizon and then some particles get thrown back and some gets pulled in which is Hawking radiation but if that's true then still the black hole get some particles in which means its mass should increase not decrease over time. did I understand something wrong here?

  69. HeyImAName HeyImALastName

    HeyImAName HeyImALastNameIl y a 3 jours

    Where did you get the super cool blue&purple astronauts in triangles shirt you wore in the majority of this video? I need it!

  70. daveangels

    daveangelsIl y a 3 jours

    Normally i can follow a bit, but this time my understanding was at a infinete distance

  71. James Hedin

    James HedinIl y a 3 jours

    journal club idea; what's going wrong with this: phys.org/news/2019-04-thermodynamic-magic-enables-cooling-energy.amp ?

  72. RallyCarDelta Gaming

    RallyCarDelta GamingIl y a 3 jours

    The way I understand it is the ads-cft model uses 4-D space in the bulk (where we are) with a 3-D, infinitely far surface. As you said, obviously that looks like "problem" because our world is, at least as far as we know, 3+1 in the potential bulk (with 2+1 on the potential surface). Can the problem be solved by compactifying the 4-D space into a 3+1, and doing the same on the surface (compact 3-D into 2+1).

  73. Jordan

    JordanIl y a 3 jours

    So before I watch this episode. That recent black hold that www know of Ames spooky action at a distance. What might we do it would take lightyears but the way we fire off entangled particles into space. What about firing some int towards that black hole and then once we calculated that reached out then measure the one entangled on our end. Maybe we experiment with the sun first?

  74. John Willis

    John WillisIl y a 4 jours

    So. What I got out of that is we've been asking the wrong questions, its what we don't see or understand that reconciles the apparent paradoxes we've backed ourselves into by making assumptions. The questions become meaningless.. the paradoxes resolve themselves if you add a higher dimension to perception. But the questions arise because we are not taking into account the reality of the situation. Reality is more complex than we assume. Sort of the same thing Einstein did to Newtonian physics. Newtons Laws work well enough as long as you ignore the details. Einstein brought up a few more details of observation and then explained them away as Special Relativity.. resolving the paradoxes he originally brought up. I sense a recurring pattern here.. sort of like a TV Series Arc.

  75. Jack Patterson

    Jack PattersonIl y a 4 jours

    Gravity = time?

  76. sir vengeance

    sir vengeanceIl y a 4 jours

    Yeah hard stuff!!

  77. Jordan Unger

    Jordan UngerIl y a 4 jours

    wot

  78. coolbeatguy

    coolbeatguyIl y a 4 jours

    I love these videos. But can you make them a little easier to understand somehow? I know basic things about the holographic universe theory, black holes and string theory. But man, this goes way beyond anyone's understanding who doesn't have a PhD in physics.

  79. He Yan

    He YanIl y a 4 jours

    I m surprised how smart youtube thinks i am to recommend me this

  80. Mellow Yellow

    Mellow YellowIl y a 4 jours

    You lost me at 0:00

  81. John Farris

    John FarrisIl y a 4 jours

    SmarterEveryDay last two videos.

  82. Ethan Joy

    Ethan JoyIl y a 4 jours

    The new graphics/sound effects ruin it for me. It’s hard enough to follow you without these unnecessary distractions. Love you bro but please tone down the special effects.

  83. Atharva #breakthrough

    Atharva #breakthroughIl y a 4 jours

    can u pls make one explaining how one cud self learn modern physics assuming mechanics and E&M background?

  84. M.A.G.

    M.A.G.Il y a 4 jours

    Could it be that this mechanism is nested? Could all spatial dimensions be such "virtual" ones?

  85. impinator maxima

    impinator maximaIl y a 4 jours

    5:47 after I smoked that dmt earlier

  86. Straylight

    StraylightIl y a 4 jours

    14:17 so what you're saying is basically that the universe is an inverted computer

  87. Dave Dave

    Dave DaveIl y a 4 jours

    I just watched a video about some math "genius" named Ramanujan. You may not know this but Ramanujan's great contribution to human understanding was correcting the widespread delusion that the infinite sum (series as they call it in math), 1+2+3+4+5...(and so on), does NOT equal infinity. Surprise! It equals -1/12! So, what's my point, you ask? My point is that science, especially Physics and Cosmology, has been hijacked by mathematicians. These charlatans are driving scientific inquiry into the absurd, where stating 2 + 2 = 5 is no longer insanity.

  88. ZSTAR 1000

    ZSTAR 1000Il y a 5 jours

    Can you do a video on microtubules and quantum consciousness?

  89. Vaughn Tiffany

    Vaughn TiffanyIl y a 5 jours

    love the Game of Life stuff. Could some rules like GoL really govern our universe?

  90. jeeze b

    jeeze bIl y a 5 jours

    Way to cover a to pic already EXHAUSTED by everyone else.

  91. maztermau

    maztermauIl y a 5 jours

    maybe we are holographic 3d projections on the event horizon of sagitarus A. In wich the we are link between the first dimension as being the center of the earth, linked to the far inner centre of the galaxy. On this 2d event horizon of the black hole, in combination with a strong 1d force on earth, like an iron core crystal, enough 2d forces can emerge on this earth to create a vertical colom right from the black hole to this 1d source, consiousness is the vertical axis between these dimensions.

  92. NovaComputing

    NovaComputingIl y a 5 jours

    Sounds like we're getting insanely close to being the aliens that all our movies show us lol.. too cool.

  93. Peter Irungu

    Peter IrunguIl y a 5 jours

    Isn't that fractal what professor James Gates said that led him to believe we live in a simulation because it resembles search engine code lol

  94. dppid083 WK

    dppid083 WKIl y a 5 jours

    Favorite video so far

  95. TTV5

    TTV5Il y a 5 jours

    Mhm yes, space

  96. J

    JIl y a 5 jours

    British accents can sell anything. Good video!

  97. timmy timmytimmy

    timmy timmytimmyIl y a 5 jours

    i dont like this game anymore ^^ frreporter.com/v/vid%C3%A9o-CAaUTyX_48g.html

  98. Davin Young

    Davin YoungIl y a 5 jours

    If the universe exhibits ADS/CFT correspondence, could that be an alternative explanation for the measured flatness of the universe instead of dark energy? Matter + dark matter, being below the critical energy density for flat/positive curvature, would give rise to the 3+1D ADS, and yet our measurements of flatness would reflect the flatness of its 2+1D boundary.

  99. desotronics

    desotronicsIl y a 5 jours

    it Doesn't matter HOW many shows I will watch I will never grasp the notion of what is said. :) i just like the pictures.

  100. ark adryan

    ark adryanIl y a 5 jours

    Wait a second ... I've been following these videos for quite a while now, and my mind just thought of a hypothetical scenario. If our universe, is a holographic projection of the 2D surface of a black hole, then maybe the expansion of the universe and the shrinking cosmic event horizon of our observable universe is the same as the black hole evaporating and "losing information" as it radiates it back out into space. (I know this might be wrong, but I thought it was cool enough to share.)

  101. Earthling Solarian

    Earthling SolarianIl y a 5 jours

    Could consciousness be dark energy or a factor driving the expansion of the universe? Although the theories we currently have are incomplete, it appears to me that the universe essentially follows physical laws, either on the macro or quantum scale, and thus the universe as it is, is a result of the natural progression of physics. However, consciousness and awareness seems to not fit into this picture. e.g. I pick up a stone on earth, take a rocket to Mars and deposit it there. It is hard to imagine that piece of rock could otherwise be on Mars if it were not intervened by a conscious decision and acted upon. Is it possible that the conscious intervention of the natural progression of nature be at least partially responsible? Is information created when humans/aliens act? And the information created is driving the expansion like adding information into a blackhole resulting in an increase of the surface area of the event horizon? A fluctuation of entropy?

  102. Eve Gill

    Eve GillIl y a 5 jours

    He said quantum "100000000"times

  103. Simone

    SimoneIl y a 5 jours

    Huh, I got more of that than I thought I would. Somewhat makes sense now. At least as an overview. I wonder how long it will take until we throw out particle as a theory and convert all the mathematics into fields interacting.. Gravity sure makes a whole lot more sense at least. Or its both *shrugs*

  104. Maya

    MayaIl y a 5 jours

    Particle theory and Quantum Field Theory are the same thing. The mathematics is already about fields interacting.

  105. Aaron Dalton

    Aaron DaltonIl y a 5 jours

    Question; the radiation from our sun that reacts with the water on our planet helps sustain life as we know it. Going out on a limb here; thinking outside the box about Hawking radiation from a black hole has a alteration effect to water base organisms and creates life. Like an asteroid gets caught in orbit for an extended period of time. Long enough to create a basic building block before landing on a planet like ours?

  106. Manoj Saxena

    Manoj SaxenaIl y a 5 jours

    Dimensions are like chest mean ribs structure small is lower upper is bigger or say biggest holo shape of ribs bones. This is shape of dimensions flour wise.